🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.