🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire him for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.